And since in Euro­pean mu­si­cal his­tory and seen from a musi­co­logi­cal point of view, it is also a logical and sys­tem­atic de­vel­op­men­tal proc­ess of ever more pre­cise in­sight into the laws of har­mony of the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic, as a Euro­pean one is the more in­clined to think of Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic^® as ‘mu­sic’. But this is merely a ques­tion of view­point.

One per­son might say it is mu­sic and, from the point of view of our Euro­pean ar­tis­tic mu­si­cal tra­di­tion, one would have to agree with him. An­other per­son, on the other hand, might say we are con­sid­er­ing some­thing which is pure in­for­ma­tion about the laws of har­mony within the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic, and which merely ap­pears to be pre­sented in a mu­si­cal form.

And he would be right too, for he is view­ing it from an­other – the musi­co­logi­cal – stand­point. I as­sume this is now clear.

The as­pects of ‘medi­cine’ and ‘ther­apy’ now remain, and these are best ex­plained by the learned doc­tor, mathe­ma­ti­cian and mu­si­colo­gist, Pythagoras in his state­ment that the laws of har­mony of the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic and of bio­logi­cal life are iden­ti­cal – a matter of fact which mod­ern chro­no­medi­cine has been able to prove.

Ques­tion: But how does a me­dici­nal ef­fect come about?

Peter Hübner: If the in­for­ma­tion about the natu­ral laws of har­mony of the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic, it­self en­shrouded in mu­sic, finds reso­nance in the hu­man or­gan­ism with the cor­re­spond­ing in­for­ma­tion about the natu­ral laws of har­mony of bio­logi­cal life, an ex­change of in­for­ma­tion and, where ap­pro­pri­ate, a cor­rec­tion of in­for­ma­tion will take place, and this cor­rec­tion of in­for­ma­tion on the part of the or­gan­ism means the rec­rea­tion of the natu­ral har­monic or­der of the bio­logi­cal sys­tem. And this means: ‘The heal­ing proc­ess be­gins.’

Where the har­mony in an or­gan­ism is dis­rupted, the reso­nance be­tween the in­for­ma­tion on or­der rele­vant to the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic and the cur­rent situa­tion of the bio­logi­cal or­der pro­duces a natu­ral heal­ing proc­ess.

This also ac­counts for the ques­tion I am often asked as to whether I have to be a medi­cal prac­ti­tio­ner or at least have medi­cal knowl­edge in or­der to cre­ate Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic^®.

Cog­ni­tion of the natu­ral har­monic or­der in the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic re­quires musi­co­logi­cal in­sight into this sci­en­tific field of crea­tion – com­pletely de­tached from any other con­sid­era­tion, medi­cal in­cluded.

And the pres­en­ta­tion of the natu­ral har­monic or­der in the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic re­quires the ar­tis­tic craft of poly­phonic clas­si­cal com­po­si­tion, as pos­sessed by our great clas­si­cal sound crea­tors.

Ac­cord­ing to Pythagoras and to the cor­re­spond­ing re­sults of stud­ies car­ried out in the field of mod­ern chro­no­medi­cine, the medi­cal suc­cess is ul­ti­mately down to the fact that the laws of har­mony of the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic and of bio­logi­cal life are by na­ture iden­ti­cal.

A mathe­ma­ti­cian does not have to be a mer­chant, just be­cause he also cal­cu­lates with fig­ures, and he does not have to be a physi­cist ei­ther, just be­cause he works with num­bers and for­mu­las.

Mathe­mati­cal for­mu­las can be ap­plied in eve­ry con­ceiv­able sci­en­tific dis­ci­pline in eve­ry con­ceiv­able cir­cum­stance, with­out it be­ing nec­es­sary that the per­son who de­vised the for­mula ever con­cerned him­self with any one of those ar­eas.

This is due to the fact that our brain is just one part of na­ture, and the natu­rally or­dered func­tion­ing of our brain also natu­rally brings forth har­monic pat­terns of or­der which – how­ever ab­stract they may be – can be ap­plied in con­crete in­di­vid­ual cases to the most di­verse con­crete re­ali­ties of na­ture.

I would like to take this still fur­ther. Just as it is sen­si­ble for the mathe­ma­ti­cian not to be a physi­cist, chem­ist or bi­olo­gist be­cause the tying up of his thoughts with the ill-de­fined struc­tures of these fields would re­duce the uni­ver­sal­ity of his ab­stract ob­ser­va­tions and cog­ni­tion, it seems to me that it would be more of a hin­drance if, to achieve medi­cal suc­cess in my work, I wanted to ac­quire some medi­cal knowl­edge.

In my opin­ion, just con­cern­ing my­self with one par­ticu­lar ill­ness could wreck the gen­eral cog­ni­tion about the phe­nome­non of health.

Har­moni­cally struc­tured mu­sic – in­clud­ing Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic^® – does not con­sider that as­pect of the ill­ness at all – this would any­way pre­cipi­tate it­self in di­verse ways as dis­har­mony, but aims pure and sim­ply at dis­play­ing the prin­ci­ples of well-be­ing and, there­fore, at dis­play­ing the natu­ral pat­terns of or­der in the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic and in­for­ma­tion about the innate natu­ral laws of har­mony which are in­te­gral to these pat­terns of or­der. Is that now clear?